Human Temporal Interface Layer (HTIL)
Phase-Coordination for Human–AI–Quantum Systems
Abstract
This paper introduces the Human Temporal Interface Layer (HTIL), completing the triad of phase-coordinated systems by extending phase-coordination to human cognition. Build- ing upon Temporal Phase Encoding (TPE, Paper 5) which made AI systems phase-coherent, and the foundational Timeverse Protocol v4.0, HTIL establishes HS° as a universal phase language accessible to human operators through the T-Compass interface—a conventional directional framework where dEAST = 0° = 06:00 UTC serves as daily phase origin. We formalize the triple display system for human comprehension (temporal/spatial/numerical), circadian phase mapping, operational phase monitoring (T-AM), and triadic alignment pro- tocols. HTIL enables deterministic human-AI-quantum coordination without continuous synchronization, providing the critical human interface component of the complete Timev- erse framework.
1. Introduction: Completing the Triadic Framework
The Timeverse research series has established a framework for temporal coordination:
- Paper 1: Theorem of Temporal Resolution Limitation [1]
- Paper 2: Phase-Coordination Principle [2]
- Paper 3: Temporal-Angular Quantum Addressing (TAQA) [3]
- Paper 4: Quantum Bootstrapping Protocol (QBP) [4]
- Paper 5: Temporal Phase Encoding (TPE) [5]
With TPE establishing phase-coherent AI systems (Paper 5), one critical component remains: human integration. This paper presents the Human Temporal Interface Layer (HTIL) as Paper 6, completing the triad by providing human-comprehensible phase coordination.
1.1 Integration with Timeverse Protocol v4.0
HTIL operates within the framework of Timeverse Protocol v4.0 [6], which provides:
- Harmony Segments (HS°): Angular time coordinate 0 <= HS◦ < 12
- Physical Realism Layer (PRL): Scientific foundation without speculative physics
- TSAE (Time-Space-Action-Event): Immutable records for auditability
- Clockchain: Decentralized temporal consensus
HTIL makes this infrastructure accessible to human operators, bridging the gap between technical protocols and human cognition.
1.2 The Human Integration Challenge
Human cognition operates with temporal representations fundamentally different from both AI and quantum systems:
| System | Temporal Representation | Granularity | Alignment Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum | Coherence windows, gate timing | Nanoseconds | Physical stability |
| AI (TPE) | HS° phase coordinates | Seconds | Learned patterns |
| Human | Circadian rhythms, subjective time | Hours | Biological/cognitive |
HTIL resolves this mismatch by establishing HS° as a universal phase language with human-accessible interfaces.
2. T-Compass: Human Cognitive Interface
2.1 T-Compass Directional Framework
The T-Compass translates abstract HS° coordinates into intuitive directional semantics:
Definition 2.1 (T-Compass Directional Mapping):
- dEAST: 0 <= ϕHS < 0.0833
- dEAST-Southeast: 0.0833 <= ϕHS < 0.1667
- dSOUTHEAST: 0.1667 <= ϕHS < 0.2500
- dSOUTH: 0.2500 <= ϕHS < 0.3333
- dSouth-southwest: 0.3333 <= ϕHS < 0.4167
- dSOUTHWEST: 0.4167 <= ϕHS < 0.5000
- dWEST: 0.5000 <= ϕHS < 0.5833
- dWEST-northwest: 0.5833 <= ϕHS < 0.6667
- dNORTHWEST: 0.6667 <= ϕHS < 0.7500
- dNORTH: 0.7500 <= ϕHS < 0.8333
- dNORTH-northeast: 0.8333 <= ϕHS < 0.9167
- dNORTHEAST: 0.9167 <= ϕHS < 1.0000
2.2 Triple Display System
Principle 2.1 (Cognitive Redundancy Principle):
Humans comprehend temporal phases through triple representation:
Displayhuman(t) = [Temporal, Spatial, Numerical]
| UTC | SWT12 | T-Compass | HS° | Human Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06:00 | 00:00 | dEAST | 0.000 | Phase origin, cycle start |
| 12:00 | 06:00 | dSOUTH | 0.250 | Solar noon, midday |
| 18:00 | 12:00 | dWEST | 0.500 | Day completion |
| 00:00 | 18:00 | dNORTH | 0.750 | Midnight reset |
3. Circadian Phase Mapping
3.1 Human Circadian Alignment
Definition 3.1 (Cognitive Performance Function):
Human cognitive performance follows circadian patterns alignable with HS°:
Pcog(ϕHS) = α0 + α1 sin(2πϕHS − φ) + ϵ(ϕHS)
where α1, φ are circadian parameters and ϵ represents individual variation.
Principle 3.1 (Circadian-Phase Alignment):
Optimal human coordination occurs when personal circadian peaks align with HS° phases:
WoptimalH = {ϕHS : Pcog(ϕHS) > Pthreshold}
3.2 Individual Phase Calibration
Protocol 3.1 (Personal Circadian Calibration)
- Initial Assessment: Monitoring of sleep/wake patterns
- Performance Testing: Cognitive tests at various HS° phases
- Model Fitting: Estimate circadian parameters for Pcog
- Window Definition: Determine WpersonalH
- TSAE Recording: Anchor calibration results to Clockchain
4. Triadic Alignment Protocol with TPE-AI
4.1 Agent Phase Window Definitions
Each agent type operates within characteristic phase windows:
| Agent | Basis | Width (∆ϕHS) |
|---|---|---|
| Human (WH) | Circadian performance | 0.200 |
| TPE-AI (WAI) | Computational availability (Paper 5) | 0.100 |
| Quantum (WQ) | Coherence predictions (TAQA, Paper 3) | 0.050 |
4.2 Triadic Alignment Protocol
Protocol 4.1 (HTIL Triadic Coordination)
Input: Current time t, human context CH, TPE-AI state SAI, quantum status SQ
Output: Alignment decision, optimal execution time topt
- Phase Computation:
- Human: ϕHSH = ϕHS(t) via T-Compass
- AI: ϕHSAI from TPE-maintained phase (Paper 5)
- Quantum: ϕHSQ from QBP-calibrated clock (Paper 4)
- Window Declaration: WX = [ϕHSX − ∆ϕHSX, ϕHSX + ∆ϕHSX] mod 1
- Intersection Computation: Walign = WH ∩ WAI ∩ WQ
- Decision:
- If |Walign| > ∆ϕmin, calculate optimal time and generate TSAE record.
- Anchor TSAE to Clockchain via Timeverse v4.0.
5. Operational Phase Monitoring (T-AM)
5.1 Temporal Awareness Module
Definition 5.1 (Phase Coherence Monitoring):
The Temporal Awareness Module (T-AM) continuously monitors:
δ(t) = maxi,j∈{H,AI,Q} |ϕHSi(t) − ϕHSj(t)|
5.2 Low-Latency Harmony (LLH) Feedback
Definition 5.2 (Phase Fidelity Index):
For triadic coordination quality:
F(t) = |WH(t) ∩ WAI(t) ∩ WQ(t)| / min(|WH(t)|, |WAI(t)|, |WQ(t)|) ∈ [0, 1]
Principle 5.1 (Auditory Phase Feedback):
Map coordination fidelity to intuitive auditory cues.
6. Methodological Validation Framework
6.1 Experimental Approach
The HTIL framework can be validated through:
| Component | Validation Method | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| T-Compass Interface | User studies | Comprehension time, error rate |
| Circadian Mapping | Longitudinal monitoring | Phase alignment accuracy |
| Triadic Coordination | Simulation studies | Coordination success probability |
| TSAE Integration | Blockchain testing | Transaction success rate |
6.2 Implementation Architecture
HTIL can be implemented with the following architecture:
- Frontend: Web-based T-Compass interface
- Backend: HTIL coordination engine
- TPE Interface: Connection to phase-coherent AI systems
- QBP Synchronization: Quantum clock integration
- Clockchain Client: TSAE anchoring service
7. Integration with Timeverse Protocol v4.0
HTIL is fully compatible with and extends Timeverse Protocol v4.0:
7.1 HS° as Universal Phase Language
HTIL uses the same HS° coordinate system defined in Timeverse v4.0 where t0 = 2022-09-23 06:00:00 UTC is the Timeverse Epoch.
7.2 TSAE for Human-Action Audit
Every human coordination action generates a TSAE record anchored to Clockchain for immutability.
7.3 Physical Realism Layer Compliance
HTIL respects all PRL constraints, including no new physical laws and maintaining SI/UTC compatibility.
7.4 Clockchain Integration
HTIL actions are recorded on Clockchain through TSAE record generation and hash anchoring.
8. Applications
8.1 Quantum-Human Collaborative Science
- Phase-aware experiment design with human scientists
- Real-time adjustment combining human intuition with AI predictions
- Circadian-optimized analysis scheduling
8.2 Healthcare Coordination
- Treatment scheduling aligned with patient circadian rhythms
- Diagnostic coordination across quantum sensors, AI analysis, human review
- Personalized timing for medication and interventions
8.3 Autonomous System Supervision
- Phase-aware human oversight of autonomous systems
- Trust calibration through predictable phase alignment
- Emergency override during critical phase windows
9. Conclusion
This paper has presented the Human Temporal Interface Layer (HTIL) as Paper 6 in the Timeverse series, completing the triad of phase-coordinated systems by providing human-accessible phase coordination.
Series Completion:
With HTIL established as Paper 6, the core Timeverse framework is complete:
- Foundation: Papers 1-2 (Theorem, Principle)
- Quantum: Papers 3-4 (TAQA, QBP)
- AI: Paper 5 (TPE)
- Human: Paper 6 (HTIL)
- Protocol: Timeverse v4.0 (Implementation Standard)
References
- [1] Ouardi, T. (2025). Theorem of Temporal Resolution Limitation and the Phase-Coordination Principle. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17955430
- [2] Ouardi, T. (2025). The Phase-Coordination Principle: From Fundamental Theorem to Quantum Network Implementation. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17969766
- [3] Ouardi, T. (2025). Temporal-Angular Quantum Addressing (TAQA). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17956182
- [4] Ouardi, T. (2025). Quantum Bootstrapping Protocol (QBP). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17981366
- [5] Ouardi, T. (2025). Temporal Phase Encoding (TPE). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18001065
- [6] Ouardi, T. (2025). Timeverse Protocol v4.0 — Core Specification. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17915987
- [7] Ouardi, T. (2025). Human Temporal Interface Layer (HTIL): Phase-Coordination for Human-AI-Quantum Systems. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18004343
- [8] Czeisler, C. A. (2017). Perspective: Casting light on sleep deficiency. Nature, 497(7450), S13–S15. DOI: 10.1038/497S13a
- [9] Roenneberg, T., Allebrandt, K. V., Merrow, M., & Vetter, C. (2012). Social jetlag and obesity. Current Biology, 22(10), 939–943. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.038
- [10] Gros, A., Biel, D., & Johannsen, G. (2019). Temporal aspects in human-machine interaction: A review. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 178–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.010
- [11] Hoffman, R. R. (2018). Human-centered AI: The role of human factors in artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 39(2), 11–18. DOI: 10.1609/aimag.v39i2.2808
- [12] Preskill, J. (2018). Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79. DOI: 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79